HUMANITY-СENTERED DESIGN: THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE SELF-PERCEPTION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN SOCIETY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2787-5137-2024-2-10

Keywords:

self-perception, humanity-centered design, stigmatization, socialization, environment

Abstract

The article explores a new iteration in the development of human-centered design, the concept of humanity-centered design in the context of accessibility and inclusion. The primary emphasis is placed on studying and analyzing the impact of technological development on key factors contributing to negative self-perception among people with disabilities. It has been proven that group studies, including focus groups, are extremely effective in testing products involving people with various types of disabilities. Engaging such users at all stages of product development significantly enhances the accessibility and usability of final solutions, allowing most potential issues to be identified and addressed at early stages. Accessibility is considered as the opportunity for equal access to information, services, and physical devices, regardless of physical or cognitive limitations. It has been found that research in the field of accessibility often has a commercial focus, highlighting the need for more systematic and global approaches. Consolidation of data from different regions of the world and the exchange of experiences among researchers, developers, and users are crucial steps towards global understanding and addressing accessibility issues. The development of socialization tools and adaptive technologies has the potential to significantly improve the integration of people with disabilities and other marginalized groups into society. This involves not only the development of technological solutions but also the creation of regulatory and ethical standards that promote a more inclusive environment. It is concluded that the development and implementation of accessibility and inclusion practices are critically important for ensuring the global well-being of all participants of the development process, both the subjects and objects of research. Continued research and development of innovative solutions that promote equality and respect for all people, regardless of their physical abilities, are necessary.

References

World Health Organization. Disability and Health. 2023. URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/disability-and-health (дата звернення: 20.07.2024).

National Council on Disability. The Power of Digital Inclusion: Technology’s Impact on Employment and Opportunities for People with Disabilities. 2011. 286 p. URL: https://www.ncd.gov/assets/uploads/reports/2011/ncd-digital-inclusion-2011.pdf (дата звернення: 20.07.2024)

World Health Organization. Global Report on Assistive Technology. 2022. 142 c. URL: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/354357/9789240049451-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (дата звернення: 20.07.2024)

Interaction Design Foundation – IxDF. What is Humanity-Centered Design? 2021. URL: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/humanity-centered-design (дата звернення: 20.07.2024)

Moreira da Silva F. Inclusive Design is Much More Than the Opposite of Exclusive Design. In: Martins N., Brandão D., Paiva F. (eds). Perspectives on Design and Digital Communication III. Springer Series in Design and Innovation. Vol. 24. Springer, Cham. 2023. P. 157–165. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06809-6_10.

Papanek V. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. 1971. Bantam Books, p. 15.

The experiences, needs and barriers of people with impairments related to usability and accessibility of digital health solutions, levels of involvement in the design process and strategies for participatory and universal design: a scoping review. / S.H. Henni et al. BMC Public Health 22, 35. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12393-1.

Norman D. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things: Basic Books. 2004, 257 p.

Body image across the adult lifespan: A longitudinal investigation of developmental and cohort effects. / A. Hockey et al. Body Image, Volume 39, 2021, pp 114–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.06.007.

Steptoe A., Di Gessa G. Mental health and social interactions of older people with physical disabilities in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal cohort study. The Lancet Public Health. 2021 6(6). P. 365–373. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00069-4.

Oticon. Oticon Opn S: A New Era in Hearing Aid Technology. 2019. URL: https://www.oticon.com/inside-oticon/news/news/2019/march-19-oticon-opn-s (дата звернення: 26.07.2024).

Understanding the Influence of AI Voice Technology on Visually Impaired Elders’ Psychological Well-Being: An Affordance Perspective. / J. Gu, et al. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology and Society. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2020. Vol. 12209. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_16/.

Parks S., Sedov V. Assessing the value of accessible technologies for organizations: A Total Economic Impact™ Study commissioned by Microsoft. Forrester Consulting. 2016. 29 p.

Linder K. Student uses and perceptions of closed captions and transcripts: Results from a national study. Corvallis, OR : Oregon State University Ecampus Research Unit. 2016. 52 p.

World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The Business Case for Digital Accessibility. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. 2018. URL: https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/ (дата звернення: 28.07.2024).

Accenture. Getting to Equal: The Disability Inclusion Advantage. 2018. 17 p. URL: https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/a-com-migration/pdf/pdf-89/accenture-disability-inclusionresearch-report.pdf.

Published

2024-10-29

Issue

Section

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES