ENTERPRISE VALUE AS AN INTEGRATED MEASURE OF FINANCIAL TRANSFORMATION EFFECTIVENESS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR WITHIN INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/inclusive_economics.11-16

Keywords:

enterprise value, financial transformation, agricultural enterprises, global capital markets, integrated assessment, risk management

Abstract

The globalization of capital markets transforms the operating environment of agricultural companies by strengthening requirements for financial transparency, corporate governance, and the quality of financial decision-making. Integration of agribusiness into international capital markets necessitates the transformation of accounting systems, financial reporting, and financial management in line with investors’ expectations. Traditional financial indicators fail to provide a comprehensive assessment of such transformation due to their retrospective nature and limited ability to capture sector-specific risks, seasonality, and price volatility. This emphasizes the need for generalized indicators capable of integrating financial, accounting, and non-financial aspects of enterprise performance. The purpose of the article is to substantiate enterprise value as an integral indicator of the financial transformation of agricultural companies in the context of their integration into international capital markets. The methodological framework is based on systemic and institutional approaches, as well as dialectical, comparative, analytical, and abstract-logical methods. The scientific novelty lies in the theoretical justification of enterprise value as an integral indicator combining the results of transformations in accounting, financial management, and risk management with the expectations of international investors. A conceptual model of value formation of agricultural companies in a globalized capital market environment is proposed, and the methodological approach to enterprise value assessment is further improved. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of using the proposed approach to support strategic financial decisions, improve investment attractiveness, and enhance communication with international investors. The results may be applied in the processes of financial transformation, valuation, and long-term development planning of agricultural enterprises.

References

Булєєв І. П., Брюховецька Н. Ю. та ін. Методи розвитку та забезпечення капіталізації промислових підприємств в умовах інституціональних змін : монографія / НАН України, Ін-т економіки пром-сті. Київ, 2016. 312 с.

Бухгалтерський облік в управлінні підприємством : підручник. 3-тє вид. / за ред. д-ра екон. наук, проф. П. О. Куцика ; П. О. Куцик, В. І. Бачинський, Р. М. Воронко та ін. Львів : Вид-во Львів. торг.-екон. ун-ту, 2023. 308 с.

Жук В. М., Бездушна Ю. С. Місія інституту бухгалтерського обліку в капіталізації національного багатства та забезпеченні сталого розвитку України. Економіка АПК. 2019. № 4. С. 6–21.

Корягін М. В. Бухгалтерський облік у системі управління вартістю підприємства: теоретико-методологічні концепції : монографія. Львів : ЛКА, 2012. 389 с.

Нападовська Л. В. Управлінський облік : підручник. Київ : КНЕУ, 2010. 648 с. URL: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/23843

Терещенко О. О. Фінансова діяльність суб’єктів господарювання : навч. посіб. Київ : КНЕУ, 2003. 554 с.

Уманець Т. В., Пігарєв Ю. Б. Статистика : навч. посіб. 2-ге вид., випр. Київ : Вікар, 2003. 623 с.

Boiko V., Lyzak M., Vasyltsiv T., Lupak R., Ohinok S. Financial and economic performance of agricultural enterprises: analysis and policy improvement. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal. 2024. Vol. 10, No. 4. P. 129–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.04.06

Ishizaka A., Labib A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011. Vol. 38, No. 11. P. 14336–14345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

Prodanchuk, M., Kovalchuk, T., Kladiyev, V., Hurenko, T., & Shevchuk , N. (2023). Theoretical and methodical principles of the formation of integrated reporting. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, № 3(50), 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.50.2023.4032

Rappaport A. 10 ways to create shareholder value. Harvard Business Review. 1986. Vol. 64, No. 5. P. 119–130. URL: https://tinyurl.com/yveyrv6p

Saaty T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 2008. Vol. 1. P. 83–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 1948. Vol. 27, No. 3. P. 379–423. URL: https://pzs.dstu.dp.ua/ComputerGraphics/ic/bibl/Shannon.pdf

Sherstiuk O. Methodological foundations for assessing the value of agro-industrial production enterprises: factor analysis. Scientific Journal of Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University. Economics. 2023. No. 1. P. 104–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2023-1-16

Buliieiev I. P., Briukhovetska N. Yu. et al. (2016) Metody rozvytku ta zabezpechennia kapitalizatsii promyslovykh pidpryiemstv v umovakh instytutsionalnykh zmin: monohrafiia [Methods of development and capitalization support of industrial enterprises under institutional changes: monograph]. Kyiv: Instytut ekonomiky promyslovosti NAN Ukrainy, 312 p. (in Ukrainian).

Bukhhalterskyi oblik v upravlinni pidpryiemstvom (2023) [Accounting in enterprise management]. 3rd ed. P. O. Kutsyk (ed.). Lviv: Lvivskyi torhovelno-ekonomichnyi universytet, 308 p. (in Ukrainian).

Zhuk V. M., Bezdushna Yu. S. (2019) Misiia instytutu bukhhalterskoho obliku v kapitalizatsii natsionalnoho bahatstva ta zabezpechenni staloho rozvytku Ukrainy [The mission of the accounting institute in the capitalization of national wealth and ensuring sustainable development of Ukraine]. Ekonomika APK, no. 4, pp. 6–21. (in Ukrainian).

Koriahin M. V. (2012) Bukhhalterskyi oblik u systemi upravlinnia vartistiu pidpryiemstva: teoretyko-metodolohichni kontseptsii: monohrafiia [Accounting in the enterprise value management system: theoretical and methodological concepts: monograph]. Lviv: LKA, 389 p. (in Ukrainian).

Napadovska L. V. (2010) Upravlinskyi oblik [Management accounting]. Kyiv: KNEU, 648 p. Available at: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/23843 (in Ukrainian).

Tereshchenko O. O. (2003) Finansova diialnist subiektiv hospodariuvannia [Financial activity of business entities]. Kyiv: KNEU, 554 p. (in Ukrainian).

Umanets T. V., Piharev Yu. B. (2003) Statystyka [Statistics]. 2nd ed. Kyiv: Vikar, 623 p. (in Ukrainian).

Boiko V., Lyzak M., Vasyltsiv T., Lupak R., Ohinok S. (2024) Financial and economic performance of agricultural enterprises: analysis and policy improvement. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 129–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.04.06

Ishizaka A., Labib A. (2011) Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 14336–14345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

Prodanchuk M., Kovalchuk T., Kladiyev V., Hurenko T., Shevchuk N. (2023) Theoretical and methodical principles of the formation of integrated reporting. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, no. 3(50), pp. 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.50.2023.4032

Rappaport A. (1986) 10 ways to create shareholder value. Harvard Business Review, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 119–130. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/yveyrv6p

Saaty T. L. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 83–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Shannon C. E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 379–423. Available at: https://pzs.dstu.dp.ua/ComputerGraphics/ic/bibl/Shannon.pdf

Sherstiuk O. (2023) Methodological foundations for assessing the value of agro-industrial production enterprises: factor analysis. Scientific Journal of Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University. Economics, no. 1, pp. 104–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2023-1-16

Published

2026-03-13