STRATEGY FOR ACTIVATING ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT TOOLS ON THE BASIS OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/inclusive_economics.12-11

Keywords:

social entrepreneurship, organizations, strategy, social impact, sustainable development, innovation, management effectiveness, tools, martial law, post-war recovery

Abstract

The article explores the theoretical and methodological principles of forming a strategy for activating management tools for organizations based on social entrepreneurship in Ukraine under martial law and post-war reconstruction. The relevance of developing a strategy is substantiated, taking into account the growth of social challenges and limited resources. The specifics of managing organizations based on social entrepreneurship are determined, which consist in the need to balance between social and economic goals, a high level of interaction with stakeholders, and increased requirements for adaptability. The approaches to forming a strategy for activating management tools are systematized, and its essence is determined as a holistic system of long-term management decisions aimed at increasing the efficiency of social enterprises. The structural components of the strategy are revealed, in particular, principles (social orientation, sustainable development, inclusiveness, innovation, adaptability, partnership, transparency), influencing factors (external and internal), strategic goals, tools, subjects, implementation algorithm, and expected results. Particular attention is paid to the conditions of martial law, which necessitate the use of crisis management, digitalization of processes, development of veteran entrepreneurship and strengthening of the humanitarian component of activity. A SWOT analysis of the development of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine was conducted, which allowed to identify its strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats, as well as to form strategic directions of response. A set of tools for activating management was substantiated, including strategic planning, social marketing, financial mechanisms, digital technologies, personnel management, social impact assessment systems and ESG approaches. It is proven that the implementation of the proposed strategy will contribute to increasing social impact, ensuring economic efficiency, integration of vulnerable groups of the population, development of territorial communities and increasing the resilience of organizations to crisis challenges.

References

Dees J.G. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship. Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business (revised vers.). URL: https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_Dees_MeaningofSocialEntrepreneurship_2001.pdf.

Nicholls A. (ed.) Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford, 2006. 444 р.

Yunus M. Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism that Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs. PublicAffairs, 2011. 256 p.

Kickul J., Lyons T. Understanding Social Entrepreneurship: The Relentless Pursuit of Mission in an Ever-Changing World. Second Edition. Routledge Publishing, 2016. 78 р.

Mair J., Marti I. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business. 2006. № 41(1). P. 36-44.

Смаль В.В., Кокоть В.О. Соціальне підприємництво: підходи до визначення та ідентифікації. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: Географічні науки. 2016. № 5. С. 69-74.

Свинчук А.А., Корнецький А.О., Гончарова М.А., Назарук В.Я., Гусак Н.Є., Туманова А.А. Соціальне підприємництво: від ідеї до суспільних змін. К: ТОВ «Підприємство «ВІ ЕН ЕЙ», 2017. 188 с.

Трегубов О.С., Дороніна О.А., Якимова Н.С. Потенціал розвитку соціального підприємництва на Вінниччині. Економіка і організація управління. 2022. № 4 (48). С. 31-40.

Дороніна О., Капранова Л., Каспрук А. Місія соціального підприємництва як інструменту управління економікою в умовах воєнного стану. Економіка і організація управління. 2023. № 4 (52). С. 132-144.

Валюс Л. О. Війна в Україні як каталізатор розвитку соціального підприємництва. Трансформаційна економіка. 2023. № 2. С. 10-15.

Ільченко В. М., Кисельов В. Р. Підтримка соціального підприємництва під час війни та подальша відбудова. Міжнародний науковий журнал «Інтернаука». Серія: Економічні науки. 2022. № 4. С. 37-42.

Dees J.G. (2015) The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship. Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business (revised vers.). Retrieved from: https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_Dees_MeaningofSocialEntrepreneurship_2001.pdf

Nicholls A. (ed.) (2006) Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford. 444 р.

Yunus M. (2011) Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism that Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs. PublicAffairs. 256 p.

Kickul J., Lyons T. (2016) Understanding Social Entrepreneurship: The Relentless Pursuit of Mission in an Ever-Changing World. Second Edition. Routledge Publishing. 78 р.

Mair J., Marti I. (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, vol. 41(1), рр. 36-44.

Smal V.V., Kokot V.O. (2016) Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo: pidkhody do vyznachennia ta identyfikatsii [Social Entrepreneurship: Approaches to Definition and Identification]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Heohrafichni nauky, vol. 5, рр. 69-74. (in Ukrainian)

Svynchuk A.A., Kornetskyi A.O., Honcharova M.A., Nazaruk V.Ya., Husak N.Ye., Tumanova A.A. (2017) Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo: vid idei do suspilnykh zmin [Social entrepreneurship: from idea to social change]. K: TOV «Pidpryiemstvo «VI EN EI». 188 р. (in Ukrainian)

Trehubov O.S., Doronina O.A., Yakymova N.S. (2022) Potentsial rozvytku sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva na Vinnychchyni [The potential for the development of social entrepreneurship in Vinnytsia region]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia, vol. 4 (48), рр. 31-40. (in Ukrainian)

Doronina O., Kapranova L., Kaspruk A. (2023) Misiia sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva yak instrumentu upravlinnia ekonomikoiu v umovakh voiennoho stanu [The mission of social entrepreneurship as a tool for managing the economy under martial law]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia, vol. 4 (52), pp. 132-144. (in Ukrainian)

Valius L. O. (2023) Viina v Ukraini yak katalizator rozvytku sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva [The war in Ukraine as a catalyst for the development of social entrepreneurship]. Transformatsiina ekonomika, vol. 2, pp. 10-15. (in Ukrainian)

Ilchenko V. M., Kyselov V. R. (2022) Pidtrymka sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva pid chas viiny ta podalsha vidbudova [Supporting social entrepreneurship during war and subsequent reconstruction]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Internauka». Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, vol. 4, pp. 37-42. (in Ukrainian)

Published

2026-06-29