MODERN INVESTMENT PROCESS OF THE MINE AS A KEY TO PRESERVING THE ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/inclusive_economics.4-6Keywords:
mining, cryptocurrency, electricity, environmental pollution, blockchainAbstract
Introduction. The study stated that the average electricity consumption of the Bitcoin network can be compared with the needs of entire countries. The University of Cambridge puts the figure at 97 terawatts per year. About the same amount of energy is consumed annually by Kazakhstan or the Netherlands. For comparison: just a year ago, the mark exceeded 73 terawatts annually. It is difficult for experts to accurately estimate the carbon footprint of Bitcoin mining, but cryptocurrency mining is seriously damaging to the environment. mining equipment uses a significant amount of electricity, the amount of which depends on the complexity of creating new blocks of information. In the future, such activity affects the environment due to the fact that a significant share of electricity is generated at thermal power plants, which are characterized by CO2 emissions. Therefore, the idea of green mining has recently become widespread in the world. Purpose is to identify the volumes of electricity consumption and analyze mining approaches using various energy sources aimed at preserving the environment. Results. At the moment, the only way to reduce environmental damage from cryptocurrency mining is to use alternative electricity: wind energy (windmills); geothermal energy; solar energy (solar panels); hydropower (hydroelectric power station). Hydromining is considered a separate method of coin production. The world experience of Iceland Since 2018, one of the most famous mining farms, Genesis Mining Enigma, has been operating. The platform runs exclusively on geothermal energy. In 2020, Iceland was at risk of facing a shortage of electricity due to the growing number of miners in the country. Data centers used more electricity than the people of the country. The low cost of electricity, the environmental friendliness of its production and the cold climate attract more and more "miners" to the country. To solve the problem, the startup Moonlite Project decided to open a representative office in Iceland. The company has developed a system of "smart" consumption of electricity based on artificial intelligence. Moonlite plans to operate on energy from renewable sources: hydro, wind and geothermal. Conclusion. Promising "Green" mining is becoming an increasingly achievable future direction of blockchain industry development. Energy consumption for the needs of farms will only increase, which means that people will need more diverse sources of energy. Miners primarily seek to survive in conditions of high competition in order to find the cheapest energy. It so happened that the cheapest way to get energy on the planet is through renewable energy sources.
References
Hens L., Karintseva O., Kharchenko M., & Matsenko O. The States Structural Policy Innovations Influenced by the Ecological Transformations. Marketing and Management of Innovations. 2018. № 3. P. 290–301. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.3-2617
Karintseva O. I., Shkarupa O. V., Shkarupa I. S. Innovation potential of ecological modernization for green growth of economics: a case study. International Journal of Ecology and Development. 2016. No. 31 (1). Р. 73–82. URL: http://www.ceser.in/ceserp/index.php/ijed/article/view/4044
Melnyk L., Dehtyarova I., Kubatko O., Karintseva O., Derykolenko A. (Disruptive technologies for the transition of digital economies towards sustainability. Economic Annals-XXI. 2019. No. 179(9-10). P. 22–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-02
Okorie David I. A network analysis of electricity demand and the cryptocurrency markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics. No. 26.2 (2021). P. 3093–3108.
Jacquet Philippe and Bernard Mans. Blockchain moderated by empty blocks to reduce the energetic impact of crypto-moneys. Computer Communications. No. 152 (2020). P. 126–136.
Yang Jiawei, Amrit Paudel, and Hoay Beng Gooi. Compensation for power loss by a Proof-of-Stake consortium blockchain microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. No. 17.5 (2020). P. 3253–3262.
Ribas Coutinho F., Pires V., Miceli C., & Menasche D.S. Crypto-Hotwire: Illegal Blockchain Mining at Zero Cost Using Public Infrastructures. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review. 2021. No. 48(4). P. 4–7.
Буряк Є.В., Редько К.Ю., Чорновол А.О., Орленко О.В. Соціально – економічні аспекти сталого розвитку України в умовах війни. Наукові записки Львівського університету бізнесу та прав. № 34/2022. URL: https://nzlubp.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/617/568
Прямі іноземні інвестиції (ПІІ) в Україну. URL: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/fdi/ (дата звернення: 05.05.2024).
Найбільші у світі нафтогазові компанії. URL: https://bakertilly.ua/news/id44370
Як Україна за рік. У Британії підрахували витрату електроенергії на майнінг біткоїна. URL: https://ua-news.liga.net/society/news/yak-ukraina-za-rik-u-britanii-pidrahuvali-vitratu-elektroenergii-na-mayning-bitkoina
Marathon побудує "зелений" дата-центр для майнінгу біткоїна. URL: https://forklog.com/marathon-postroit-zelenyj-data-tsentr-dlya-majninga-bitkoina/
Дерун І.А., Склярук І.П. Онтологічні аспекти сутності криптовалюти та її відображення в обліку: сайт URL: https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/7658/1/28.pdf (дата звернення: 01.06.2024).
Hens L., Karintseva O., Kharchenko M., & Matsenko O. (2018) The States Structural Policy Innovations Influenced by the Ecological Transformations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, no. 3, pp. 290–301.
Karintseva O. I., Shkarupa O. V., Shkarupa I. S. (2016) Innovation potential of ecological modernization for green growth of economics: a case study. International Journal of Ecology and Development, no. 31 (1), pp. 73–82
Melnyk L., Dehtyarova I., Kubatko O., Karintseva O., Derykolenko A. (2019) Disruptive technologies for the transition of digital economies towards sustainability. Economic Annals-XXI, no. 179(9-10), pp. 22–30.
Okorie David I. (2021)A network analysis of electricity demand and the cryptocurrency markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics, no. 26.2, pp. 3093–3108.
Jacquet Philippe and Bernard Mans (2020) Blockchain moderated by empty blocks to reduce the energetic impact of crypto-moneys. Computer Communications, no. 152, pp. 126–136.
Yang Jiawei, Amrit Paudel, and Hoay Beng Gooi (2020) Compensation for power loss by a Proof-of-Stake consortium blockchain microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, no. 17.5, pp. 3253–3262.
Ribas Coutinho F., Pires V., Miceli C., & Menasche D. S. (2021) Crypto-Hotwire: Illegal Blockchain Mining at Zero Cost Using Public Infrastructures. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, no. 48(4), pp. 4–7.
Buriak Ye. V., Redko K. Yu., Chornovol A. O., Orlenko O. V. (2022) Sotsialno – ekonomichni aspekty staloho rozvytku Ukrainy v umovakh viiny. Naukovi zapysky Lvivskoho universytetu biznesu ta prava, vol. 34. Available at: https://nzlubp.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/617/568
Priami inozemni investytsii (PII) v Ukrainu Available at: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/fdi/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Naybilshi u sviti naftogazovi kompaniyi. Available at: https://bakertilly.ua/news/id44370 (accessed May 1, 2024).
Yak Ukrayina za rik. U Britaniyi pidrahuvali vitratu elektroenergiyi na mayning bitkoyina. Available at: https://ua-news.liga.net/society/news/yak-ukraina-za-rik-u-britanii-pidrahuvali-vitratu-elektroenergii-na-mayning-bitkoina (accessed May 1, 2024).
Marathon postroit «zelenyiy» data-tsentr dlya mayninga bitkoina. Available at: https://forklog.com/marathon-postroit-zelenyj-data-tsentr-dlya-majninga-bitkoina/ (accessed May 1, 2024).
Derun I. A., Sklyaruk I. P. (2024) Ontologichni aspekti sutnosti kriptovalyuti ta yiyi vidobrazhennya v obliku. Available at: https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/7658/1/28.pdf (accessed June 1, 2024).