THE INFLUENCE OF MORALITY ON THE ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR OF A SUBJECT OF THE SOCIETY IN THE CONDITIONS OF INCLUSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/inclusion-society-2022-1-2Keywords:
inclusive education, subject of society, morality, moral, economic behavior, economic system, moral economyAbstract
Introduction. The problems of the influence of morality, spiritual orientations and ideological ideals on the economic activity of society become not only an actual scientific idea, but is also a center of acute social discussion directed on a finding of a balance between rationality, which is rapidly growing in modern society and morality as universal human value, which must harmonize our society. Certainly, moral values are an important connecting link between society, social environment and individual, personality and its inner world. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to determine the priority of morality that affects on the economic behavior of the subject of society in conditions of social and educational inclusion in Ukraine. Results. On the basis of comparative analysis of notions «morality» and «moral» reached the following conclusions that: «moral» is a system of norms, rules and requirements, produced in society, which regulate the interaction among people, their relation to the phenomena of real world; «morality» – is a set of consciousness, skills and habits of person, which connected with compliance of these norms, rules and requirements. The morality formed with the personality of subject of society and inseparable from ones «I am». In the result of monitoring identified factors of influence on the formation of content of moral education of subject of society in the process relationship with the purpose of creation of Gross Domestic Product and value added in the country. Different approaches of understanding of result of influence of morality on the economic behavior of subject of society in conditions of inclusion, because the state of economics of Ukraine first of all depends on the moral and professional stimulus of the manager, the politician, the businessman etc.
References
Shul’ha V. Fenomenolohiya obdarovanosti u sub”yektnovchynkovomu vymiri. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/166212/1/ %D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1 %82%D1%82%D1%8F%20%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B6%D1%83%D0%BA%20(%D0%A8%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B3%D0%B8)%20%D0%92.%D0%94.%206.pdf
Smith A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Digireads.com Publishing. 2018. 553 r.
Frank S.L. Dukhovni osnovy suspil’stva. Myslyteli XX stolittya. Respublika. 1992. 512 s.
Razin, A. (2013). Ekonomichna etyka: epistemolohichnyy status i zmist. Epistemolohichni doslidzhennya v filosofiyi, sotsial’nykh i politychnykh naukakh, 2(23), 218-224. Retrieved iz https://visnukpfs.dp.ua/index.php/ PFS/article/view/513
Kompaniyets’ V. Shchodo naslidkiv porushennya moral’noho zakonu v zhytti suspil’stva ta v ekonomitsi. Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsial’nymy systemamy: filosofiya, psykholohiya, pedahohika, sotsiolohiya. #4. 2016. S.100-114
Platon. Derzhava. Biblioteka antychnoyi literatury. Apriori. 2021.464 s.
Aristotel’. Poetyka. URL: https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Aristotle/Poetyka_vyd_1967.pdf?PHPSESSID=bo5g8imgnnm3vk8114qs42k140
Hehel’ H. Entsyklopediya filosofskykh nauk. URL: https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/istorija_nemeckaja_klassicheskaja/gegel_ehnciklopedija_filosofskikh_nauk_nauka_logiki/12-1-0-44
Feyeberkh L. Ystoryya fylosofyy. URL: https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/istorija_nemeckaja_klassicheskaja/fejerbakh_istorija_filosofii_sobranie_proizvedenij/12-1-0-1094
Kompanyets V.V. Typyzatsyya sotsyal’no-эkonomycheskykh system po эtycheskomu kryteryyu. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti UkrDAZT. Kharkiv, 2009. #28. S. 262-272.
Edward Palmer Thompson. The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century. Past & Present, 1971. # 50.
Samuel Hayat. Une politique en mode mineur. Ordre patronal et ordre communautaire dans les mines du Nord au XIXe siècle. Politix, 2017. # 120.
James C. Scott. The Moral Economy of the Peasant Rebellion & Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1977.